ayodhya verdict
-
SC found 1949 idol installation and 1992 mosque demolition illegal – yet it paved way for a temple
Rohan Venkataramakrishnan
-
Maharashtra: ‘First temple, then government,’ says Shiv Sena on last day of outgoing Assembly’s term
Scroll Staff
-
Ayodhya verdict is silent on why Muslims must prove exclusive possession of site – but not Hindus
Sruthisagar Yamunan
-
Ayodhya case: A Solomonic judgment that doesn’t quite provide closure
Mohan Guruswamy
-
‘Judgment must be accepted’: Muslim leaders and scholars react to the Ayodhya verdict
Ipsita Chakravarty
-
Ayodhya verdict reaffirms independence of judiciary, says Modi; Opposition too welcomes order
Scroll Staff
-
Ayodhya judgement features unsigned note on further evidence for Ram’s birthplace
Scroll Staff
-
Full text: The Supreme Court’s reasoning in paving the way for a Ram temple to be built in Ayodhya
Scroll Staff
-
Ayodhya ruling: Prasar Bharati warns ‘The Guardian’ against provoking communal hatred
Scroll Staff
-
Ayodhya verdict explained in five paragraphs
Scroll Staff
-
Ayodhya verdict: SC awards disputed land to Hindus for Ram temple, alternative site for mosque
Scroll Staff
-
Ayodhya verdict: Modi calls for peace, says judgement will not be anyone’s victory or loss
Scroll Staff
-
Ayodhya verdict today: Here’s a timeline of the main events in the case
Scroll Staff
-
Ayodhya case: 10 articles on the title dispute ahead of Supreme Court verdict
Scroll Staff
-
Modi asks ministers not to make irresponsible comments on Ayodhya case, urges them to maintain peace
Scroll Staff
-
Ayodhya verdict: National Security Act may be invoked against troublemakers if needed, say UP police
Scroll Staff
-
Ayodhya verdict: Madhya Pradesh government prohibits police officials from taking leave from Friday
Scroll Staff